Hang on while we load the rest of the page...
 
 
Local Voices

Cardin Calls for a National Discussion on Gun Control Following Newtown School Shooting

Washington, DC – Speaking on the floor of the U.S. Senate Monday, Senator Ben Cardin (D-MD) called for a national discussion on how we can better protect our children from gun violence. In reiterating his support for an assault weapons ban, he also questioned the need for civilians to have access to military weapons.

Video of Senator Cardin’s full floor statement can be downloaded here or viewed here.

“I want to express my deepest condolences, on behalf of the people of Maryland, to the families of the 20 students and the six adults who lost their lives at the hand of a single shooter at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut. It is heartbreaking to listen to the stories of the innocent lives that were cut short. The pain and grief of the families and friends of these students and teachers are unimaginable. ... We send out prayers to all.

“This is a tragedy beyond words. I think president Obama said it best last night that ‘our hearts are broken.’ But as other Senators have said, we need to take action. Congress needs to come together to take action to protect the safety of our children. We must do better. There have been too many episodes in which children’s lives and others have been lost. We must figure out a way to prevent these types of tragedies.

“Such a conversation must include a discussion about the culture of violence that permeates our culture today, including the glorification of violence to our children and young adults. We see too much of this violence and it has to have an impact on young children.

“We need to know how we can responsibly deal with this type of circumstance and we must include a discussion of mental health services provided to Americans, especially our students. Many of us have talked about this in the past. We have to be more aggressive in dealing with the mental health needs of all the people in our community.

“As Chairman Leahy and others have pointed out, we must discuss the ready access of individuals to weapons. I know there are different views in this Congress. I must tell you that I do not understand why we need to allow access to military-style assault weapons and ammunition. I strongly support Senator Feinstein’s effort to reinstate the expired 1994 ban on assault weapons, including a ban on ammunition magazines that hold more than 10 rounds.

“Senator Durbin raised a very valid point: We regulate automobiles and we regulate consumer products – we should for public safety. We should regulate firearms for public safety reasons too. There is no need for assault weapons to be held by the public. In my view, there is no legitimate reason for a civilian to possess a military-style weapon or to have large-capacity ammunition clips.

“Congress also should examine whether we can strengthen our background check system for gun buyers, along with criminal penalties for those who illegally purchase or transfer guns. We need to take a look at safety locks to protect children. We also need to look at those who have multiple gun purchases and we need to look at gun-show purchases. All of these should be examined to see whether or not we can make our communities safer without infringing upon the legitimate right of individuals to possess guns. Sportsmen should be able to use guns for hunting.

“Sportsmen’s rights obviously will be protected, but we can do a better job in protecting public safety. We’ve talked about this before and we need to act. We need to act in a comprehensive way that will make our society safer. I pledge to act on behalf of the safety of our children.”

H.R. Pufnstuf

6:10 pm on Tuesday, December 18, 2012

Ben Cardin upon hearing the news of the shooting: "Innocent people were killed by a crazy person? Well, sometimes after drone attacks there is collateral damage...OH WAIT! IN AMERICA! NOOOOOOOO!"

Reply
Comment_arrow

mike gardiner

6:35 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

How about this. We charge 150% sales tax on every gun, $300 registration fee per year on every gun, ban assault weapons, ban ammo clips with more than 10 rounds on all guns, require background checks for both criminal and mental records, require a training course, close the loop hole for gun shows, require all weapons be kept in an armory to be checked out by the owners and put armed police in every school paid for by the taxes and registration fee and I will support the distortions of the Second Amendment.

Native

10:07 pm on Tuesday, December 18, 2012

Sure, why shouldn't another democrat jump on the anti-gun bandwagon? Good grief, these people just don't get it. The public does not have access to military weapons!!! A so-called "assault weapon" is nothing more then a semi-automatic rifle, just like the millions of others out there. The public does not have access to fully automatic weapons!!! The one & only reason these liberals are pushing gun control now is that it's an easy way to make it look like they care, like they're doing something. Nothing more, nothing less.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Greg G.

11:12 pm on Saturday, December 22, 2012

Umm you could not be more wrong. I can take what you call a semi-automatic rifle (AR-15) go to a gun show and purchase essentially the firing mechanism for an M-16 (with no background check) do a little filing, drop it into the AR-15 and voila. Fully automatic assault weapon. Close the gun show loop holes and then talk.

Comment_arrow

John

8:37 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Inaccurate. Anyone that is wealthy enough to Find an eligible firearm, pay for the federal permit, pass the background check, obtain the littany of permits, applications and paperwork from a law enforcement oficer, can infact purchase a fully automatic firearm.

Comment_arrow

John

8:39 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Greg is correct, however what he has pointed out can be accomplished isa violation of federal law.

Chris W

6:03 am on Wednesday, December 19, 2012

Political opportunism at its finest.

Reply

Steve Kelly

8:17 am on Wednesday, December 19, 2012

Yes, it sucks to be an informed, rational person in Maryland.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Craig

10:29 pm on Wednesday, December 19, 2012

It sucks that we have these collectivists hell-bent on usurping our ideas, our thoughts, our actions... day by day and year by year.

But those of us on the side of liberty have to realize that collectivists have dominated this scene in MoCo for many, many years and we haven't really fought back.

2013 is the year we come back.

Comment_arrow

Chet Brewer

12:41 pm on Sunday, December 23, 2012

Craig ole buddy, your "liberty" has a bill attached to it that many of us are unwilling to pay. I don't begrudge a weapon for household protection(shotgun) but very clearly do begrudge high velocity rounds and large magazines next door. Your "liberty" is your neighbors repression. Move to the desert where you have no neighbors and then exercise your liberty. Somalia is nice this time of year

Eastsider

8:33 am on Wednesday, December 19, 2012

Yea lets put more on the plate of the DC idiots. They can't get a budget, now a fiscal cliff is looming, won't cut spending and now we want them to tackle gun control. These idiots can't multitask.

Reply
Comment_arrow

jag

10:24 am on Wednesday, December 19, 2012

Huh? They multitask every hour of the day. Just because you don't bother reading with regularity and only know about the fiscal cliff doesn't mean everything else just doesn't exist.

Comment_arrow

Eastsider

10:39 am on Wednesday, December 19, 2012

Jag,

Look at the state of our country does it really look like these idiots can multitask. They may try but they are failing.

Comment_arrow

Lorna D. Rudnikas

6:10 pm on Wednesday, December 19, 2012

Oh for goodness sake, don't forget the new obamacare put into law, not read, and when the true cost takes effect, the folks who voted for it will be complaining about the short-circuit synaptic misfire to cover their excuse about the fact they did not really know what was in it...and sadly, did not give a rat's fuzzy butt. Oh well, just keeps adding more and more to the synaptic misfire congressional equation. Wonder if it has anything to do with downsizing/dummy down education system that may have come home to roost? Trying to think how far back it all began...mmmm....

Buck Harmon

9:02 am on Wednesday, December 19, 2012

The actual struggle here is for power...one group over another...kinda like a chess game in action...will the government have power over the public..?.. or will the public control the government?
The public safety thing is mere illusion...total bullshit..

Reply
Comment_arrow

Buck Harmon

9:05 am on Wednesday, December 19, 2012

What would be best for our grandkids..?

Comment_arrow

jag

10:25 am on Wednesday, December 19, 2012

For them to not be shot a half-dozen times each.

Comment_arrow

Lorna D. Rudnikas

6:12 pm on Wednesday, December 19, 2012

yes, Buck, and the "illusion" tricks are getting mighty tiresome!!

Jeff Hawkins

9:22 am on Wednesday, December 19, 2012

I agree with the notion that there should be a "national" discussion on this issue. Personally I would like to see semi-auto's go away, same with large ammo clips. Of course there is much more to the "problem" than just the weapons........it's the culture in America that we have sunk too. The weapons sadly have become the "tool" of the afflicted and as always with everything in life........."money" is a factor as well. Things will change, it will take some time as it won't happen overnight, but things will change. Those that know me know that I regularly blast Cardin, O'Malley etc., I'm a long time conservative that finds guns and the resulting by-product as revolting (except in law enforcement & military).

Reply
Comment_arrow

Andy

9:55 am on Friday, December 21, 2012

"Personally I would like to see semi-auto's go away". You mention semi auto's going away, but you either have auto or semi-auto. I think you mean auto, but those aren't available for purchase anyways. Auto shoots continuously until you let off the trigger. Semi-auto, which is what civilians have access to, shoots each time you pull the trigger. There were no assault weapons used in Conn. He had one out in his trunk. It's not much different than a standard hunting rifle that shoots once each time you pull the trigger. Conn. has the 2nd-4th toughest laws in the nation.

Comment_arrow

FIFA_archived

10:31 am on Friday, December 21, 2012

Andy R., you are wrong. He had a semi-automatic assault weapon. You may look up the definition by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms of an assault weapon here:

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2012-title27-vol3/xml/CFR-2012-title27-vol3-sec478-11.xml

Second fact, the kids and adults were shot not by handguns, but by a variant of the AR-15 which is a semi-automatic assault weapon. It is almost identical to a M-16 with the one exception of not having an automatic mode. It fires the same high velocity 5.56mm/.223 round. Some would say that one is much more accurate in semi-automatic mode anyway. Here is what the Connecticut State Police had to say:

http://www.cnn.com/2012/12/18/us/connecticut-lanza-guns/index.html

Last fact - just because Connecticut has tough laws doesn't mean you can't get the weapons you want easily because all you have to do is to go to another state.

At least we can now agree on facts perhaps.

Comment_arrow

Native

10:43 am on Friday, December 21, 2012

FIFA, a true "assault weapon" is an automatic firearm. The term has been merged into the public discourse (and now the government's language). It was originally coined by the media many years ago to describe "scary guns". The semi-automatic rifle the shooter had in his possession was no different then any other semi-auto rifle except in looks. There are other rifles that use more powerful ammo. This illustrates how ludicrous the "assault rifle" argument is.

Comment_arrow

FIFA_archived

10:47 am on Friday, December 21, 2012

Native, if you wish to create you own definition go ahead. The "Assault Weapon Ban" used the definition I provided.

The AR-15 is not your everyday semi-automatic rifle though. It is the same as a military M-16 except for the automatic mode.

Comment_arrow

FIFA_archived

10:53 am on Friday, December 21, 2012

Native, that AR-15/M-16 also can use this very capable 90 round magazine available for purchase here from Brownells in Iowa.:

http://www.brownells.com/magazines/rifle-magazines/magazines/ar-15-m16-90-rounder-reg-magazine-prod23282.aspx

Maybe that is scary enough for you now?

If not this Zombie ammunition that fits right into the AR-15 will do it?

http://www.brownells.com/ammunition/rifle-ammo/hornady-zombie-max-rifle-ammunition-prod45017.aspx

Comment_arrow

Native

5:29 pm on Friday, December 21, 2012

FIFA, I'm not creating my own definition. As I said, the media coined it & it has merged into the public & government jargon. And you are wrong, the AR is just like an everyday semi except for how it looks. An everyday rifle can use a large mag as well. Other everyday rifles use higher power rounds. So tell me, how else is it different?

Comment_arrow

Chris W

7:39 pm on Friday, December 21, 2012

Even Wikipedia calls BS on the term "assault weapon"?

"the term 'assault weapon' has no consistent or specific definition and is, therefore, subject to varying definitions for varying purposes, including definitions that include common non-military firearms."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assault_weapon

Comment_arrow

FIFA_archived

7:45 pm on Friday, December 21, 2012

So Native what you are saying is that an AR15 and a everyday semi are both semi-automatic assault weapons as defined by the ATF. Which is probably a slightly better source than the one Chris W seems to like, Wikipedia.

Quite simply Native, if the AR15 is not an assault weapon, what is the M16? Your definition of assault weapon is it must have an automatic mode? That's hogwash and you know it.

Comment_arrow

FIFA_archived

7:48 pm on Friday, December 21, 2012

Gee Chris, I wonder who edited Wikipedia last, LaPierre? Probably. Do better than than please.

Comment_arrow

Native

8:26 pm on Friday, December 21, 2012

Well FIFA, tell me what makes your "assault rifle" different then my semi-auto deer rifle that has a 30 round mag. Other then the fact that it's black & "looks scary". You can't, can you? This is simply my point. And that is the silliness of an "assault weapons" ban.

Comment_arrow

FIFA_archived

8:48 pm on Friday, December 21, 2012

As I have stated on the Patch many times, if it is semi-automatic you can't own it. There is no need for it, that simple. Won't happen and I recognize that too. But that is the only way mass shootings will ever end.

You want a gun, bolt action, single shot. That works well for hunting and target shooting. After that, it is about shooting people when in the wrong hands.

Comment_arrow

FIFA_archived

9:05 pm on Friday, December 21, 2012

Thank you Frank. Chris, you were caught red-handed.

Comment_arrow

Native

9:26 pm on Friday, December 21, 2012

So FIFA, when you can't argue with facts, you just spout nonsense.

Comment_arrow

FIFA_archived

9:42 pm on Friday, December 21, 2012

Native. You want to talk about nonsense. You make up your own definition of assault weapon and expect everyone to believe it? You are a fool. I have tired of your idiocy and silly asinine points of view. Lanza had an assault weapon to kill those children. What about that don't you understand? Is it English? Go away, I'm done with you. Why is it morons that defend the 2nd amendment at times?

Comment_arrow

Native

9:53 pm on Friday, December 21, 2012

LOL, that's ok FIFA. Straight out the Rules For Radicals handbook. When they can't win an argument against facts, liberals resort to name calling.

Comment_arrow

Chris W

10:51 pm on Friday, December 21, 2012

I suppose if the definition was from the Brady Campaign you would not complain.

Bowie Boy

12:30 pm on Wednesday, December 19, 2012

The discussion shouldn't be about gun control... Instead it should be about parents who bring weapons like this into a home with a mentally unstable adult in the same home. Nancy Lanza is an idiot. We need to protect ourselves against grown adults, our neighbors, that can’t make proper parental decisions. The discussion should be about raising children to value human life. To restrict their exposure to violent games and movies that promote killing. This nut job was granted access and allowed to play violent video games 24/7 and granted access to real weapons. Don’t blame the guns, the movies, or the games. Blame the parents. This is a parental issue not a gun issue.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lorna D. Rudnikas

6:17 pm on Wednesday, December 19, 2012

Oh Bowie Boy, you are suggesting that "responsibility" is a very important part of parenting....how quaint!

Craig

10:30 pm on Wednesday, December 19, 2012

Ben Cardin is a ninny and I am ashamed he's a state senator from Maryland. Not as ashamed of him as I am of McCulsky...but still pretty ashamed and disgusted.

Reply
Comment_arrow

1ke

6:40 am on Saturday, December 22, 2012

Craig, going through life carrying the dual burden of free-floating shame and a weak stomach must be very difficult. Bob Baumann. Ted Agnew. Dale Anderson. Feeling queasy, yet?

I didn't think so. Maybe, Dr. 1ke, can help you with this.

BlutAusNord

2:19 pm on Wednesday, February 6, 2013

Cardin is a tool.He needs to keep his face out of Mikulski's nether region & breathing in those noxious fumes.

Reply

Sanchez

10:40 am on Friday, December 21, 2012

From one who wants to be POTUS.

"In the interview, Mr. Cuomo did not offer specifics about the measures he might propose, but, while discussing assault weapons, he said:

“Confiscation could be an option. Mandatory sale to the state could be an option. Permitting could be an option — keep your gun but permit it.”

Cuomo, Hitler, Stalin, Mao, birds of a feather.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Honeygo Hal

9:21 am on Saturday, December 22, 2012

That article describes to a "T" quite a few Patch commenters...

Lorna D. Rudnikas

9:33 pm on Friday, December 21, 2012

I guess my question is, what should be the weapon of choice for citizens to have in their homes as protective measures against those who would do them harm? Perhaps a "spatula?" That should keep the more liberal minded folks happy. Of course the criminal elements, et al who wish to do them harm will be well armed no doubt and by the time the law abiding, peace loving citizen get their little old single "bolt" in place, I suspect they will be quite dead. Then, suppose there are two or more of them. Oh there are just so many scenarios. Will Mr. Cardin take all into account? Can we just leave LaLa Land for a moment and get serious about murderers vs law abiding citizens. Hoodlums will get guns and other weapons of destruction no doubt about it. What then honey child???

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brook Hubbard

10:47 pm on Friday, December 21, 2012

Let's see, this month alone (only three weeks) in Howard County, we've had...

1) Two home invasions involving firearms
2) Four armed robberies (three with firearms)
3) Eight robberies using physical assault

Certainly nothing to someone from PG, DC, or Baltimore... but definitely enough to warrant a sense of fear among residents and a desire to protect one's self.

Comment_arrow

Brook Hubbard

11:51 pm on Friday, December 21, 2012

"When did they rename "burglary" "home invasion"?"

In the 1920's, when home invasion was defined?

1ke

10:15 pm on Friday, December 21, 2012

Why this constant dosing of stranger-danger? Does this happen a lot where you live or has it hit particularly close to home? I have never seen much of it previously. It just seemed to bubble suddenly to the surface like the head on a beer.

Reply

Lorna D. Rudnikas

12:16 am on Saturday, December 22, 2012

Shall we wait for that to happen dear Frankie???? Would love to hear your in depth solutions to a socalled perceived need for self protection...but then, when living in LaLa Land you probably don't need solutions to anything. All will magically be taken care of by Big Brother as soon as you and fellow cohorts get everything and everybody in line.

Reply

Lorna D. Rudnikas

7:45 am on Saturday, December 22, 2012

Saaaay whaaaat, Frankie darling?????

Reply
Comment_arrow

Native

3:49 pm on Saturday, December 22, 2012

Killed due to liberal democratic policies.

Comment_arrow

FIFA_archived

3:59 pm on Saturday, December 22, 2012

"Cause of deaths" = gunshot wound from AR 15, .223 high velocity assault weapon round, fired from semi-automatic assault weapon. Per the coroner's report.

Comment_arrow

Native

4:08 pm on Saturday, December 22, 2012

Which is the direct result of liberal policies of gun-free zones, gun control, etc.

Comment_arrow

FIFA_archived

4:24 pm on Saturday, December 22, 2012

Idiotic comment, relative of LaPierre. Blame anything but the bullet that killed 20 children and seven adults. Bullet pleads not guilty, someone else made the bullet do it. Do you realize how much of an complete idiot you sound like? Never mind, idiots don't realize anything. Crawl back in your hole. Hug your gun, maybe it is a warm gun.

Comment_arrow

Native

4:32 pm on Saturday, December 22, 2012

Now, now, FIFA why all the vitriol? Where's your Christmas spirit? But I guess you've been reading too much of Saul Alynsky, thus the personal attacks & name calling instead of rational debate.

Comment_arrow

FIFA_archived

4:37 pm on Saturday, December 22, 2012

Native, you seem to be celebrating the death of 28 people? Go out and buy yourself another gun. I have nothing against idiots like you. You are what you are. There is no rational debate with an orifice like you. Are you serious? I have seen sewage that is smarter than you.

Comment_arrow

Buck Harmon

8:42 am on Tuesday, December 25, 2012

Smart sewage...rational statement...

kevin

4:19 pm on Saturday, December 22, 2012

The Mother did NOT die from an assault weapon .No she died in her sleep a victim of being rich in America. see she COULDN"T get state social help she had to have him committed to a private facility which tipped him off since he was over 18.Fact is if she had been poor social sevices probably would have had him committed BEFORE anyone died .I said probably because it seems as though there was enough cause but because they are so backlogged in drug courts mental illness isn't a priority. He choose school because it was undefended and IMMEDIATELY turned gun on himself when legal guns arrived. Can't dispute that,week before mall shooter turned gun on himself after gun jammed allowing person with aCCP to draw on him he went hid got gun working and shot HIMSELF. Didn't try and shoot it out . How can any sane person say gun laws would have stopped these ? oh yeah Marylanders that makes it right .

Reply
Comment_arrow

FIFA_archived

4:29 pm on Saturday, December 22, 2012

God to Earth, please send kevin to me soon, he needs a lot of help.

kevin

4:28 pm on Saturday, December 22, 2012

The team with the most points. Or am I wrong?

Reply
Comment_arrow

kevin

5:01 pm on Saturday, December 22, 2012

Fifa ,No one believes anything where you even mention God ,unless it is to make fun of him.

Comment_arrow

1ke

6:20 pm on Saturday, December 22, 2012

Are you referring to him, FIFA, or Him?

Lorna D. Rudnikas

5:16 pm on Saturday, December 22, 2012

Of course Frank, anyone disturbed by Alinsky's messages must be an idiot. Alinskyites are so easy to mark....just can't help yourselves!

Reply

Lorna D. Rudnikas

5:40 pm on Saturday, December 22, 2012

Geez Frank, do we have to go into a long diatribe about Alinsky...pure and simple Alinsky was a devout and genius community organizer and his message, pure and simple, was and continues to be long after his death, REVOLUTION! Revolution by a thousands baby stings and when the moment offers bigger stings, LEAN FORWARD!!

Reply

Lorna D. Rudnikas

6:10 pm on Saturday, December 22, 2012

Good grief Frank, all you have to do is google Alinsky's name and get all the quotes you want without even buying his lovely handbook for radicals. Come on now, I have given my diagnosis...he was a revolutionary, albeit a genius community organizer. Why waste time asking for quotes from his writings...why no share a thought or two that you have about Alinsky and how his philosophy has influenced your thinking process..or not!!!

Reply

kevin

6:34 pm on Saturday, December 22, 2012

Frank by mass shootings in Maryland are you asking about this weekend or year? I mean by Monday I'm sure more Marylanders will be involved in mass shootings than that Conn town last 10 years ,More knife crimes also.

Reply

1ke

6:42 pm on Saturday, December 22, 2012

Anyone truly interested in Saul Alinsky and would prefer to mix in a little reading with their mouthing off might try http://wapo.st/ZryxK1

Now, what is it that makes Alinsky so bad? What can I read to convince myself? Send no Youtube links or refried beans.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lorna D. Rudnikas

6:57 pm on Saturday, December 22, 2012

Do you think a revolutionary is "bad" per se? Why don't you read up on him and give your own opinion regarding what his revolutionary ideas can do for our great country. Because, it looks like there are a number of folks in Washington (actually in the administration) who may very well see his words for radicals as their true mission. I think the latest buzz words are LEAN FORWARD!!! Interesting..wonder what THEY intend to do if and when the majority of our wonderful citizens actually do decide to LEAN FORWARD!

Comment_arrow

1ke

7:18 pm on Saturday, December 22, 2012

Did you read the link? Plain yes or no will do.

kevin

6:53 pm on Saturday, December 22, 2012

Well Lorna frank asked me how many Marylanders involved in mass shootings, I'm not sure what he means between Monday and Thursday in Baltimore alone there were victims of for multiple shootings ,multiple victims one shooter each location ,four different locations,was A long time ago November 16th. .Guess mass shootings don't count to Frank if they are black victims and guns were illegal .

Reply

Lorna D. Rudnikas

7:00 pm on Saturday, December 22, 2012

I think we might need to stick to mass shootings of innocents, no matter the color, creed, national origin or religion, etc. Hard to say how much the gun fire in Baltimore City is the result of gang related killings or other. I am sure the police have excellent stats on that.

Reply

amark

7:15 pm on Saturday, December 22, 2012

Can we have a "discussion" on having morons like Cardin removed from Congress? The second amendment is not about hunting and I'm tired of hearing these pompous liberals saying "no one needs these types of guns". There are literally tens of millions of what people refer to as assault weapons in the country already. If Congress bans the sale and manufacture of these guns are they also going to propose confiscating the ones that are now legally owned? Because if a ban on new assault weapons is the answer why don't they also advocate taking the ones that are already out there? These people who are attempting to take advantage of this horrible event in CT by pushing for the gun control they have always wanted are making me sick.

Reply
Comment_arrow

1ke

7:20 pm on Saturday, December 22, 2012

No need to discuss. Tell Dan Bongino you are ready for a change. Then, you vote.

Comment_arrow

FIFA_archived

7:23 pm on Saturday, December 22, 2012

I vote for taking all assault weapons and large capacity magazines from everyone. The Japanese have it right. Another question? I understand it will not happen, but it would be nice if it did.

Comment_arrow

Sanchez

10:19 am on Monday, December 24, 2012

"I vote for taking all assault weapons and large capacity magazines from everyone. "

To borrow a phrase you used on another topic. Thankfully you do not get a vote to deny us our civil rights!

1ke

7:55 pm on Saturday, December 22, 2012

Lorna apparently chooses not to read.

Anyone truly interested in Saul Alinsky and would prefer to mix in a little reading with their mouthing off might try http://wapo.st/ZryxK1

Reply
Comment_arrow

FIFA_archived

7:59 pm on Saturday, December 22, 2012

I believe she watches FOX, dog videos, and types on the Patch. Also retired from state government. No insult, just repeating what she has said! Gosh, this is hard.

Comment_arrow

Lorna D. Rudnikas

10:49 pm on Saturday, December 22, 2012

Ahhh 1ke..looks like you may have read his works and agree. The fog is clearing...

Comment_arrow

Lorna D. Rudnikas

10:59 pm on Saturday, December 22, 2012

Steve darling...I am not worried about Saul. He is in the happy hunting ground. It is the folks with some power who cling to his thoughts/words/deeds and blindly, very blindly LEAN FORWARD!!! That is great cause to worry, especially for the folks who see a real problem with LEANING FORWARD in the name of Alinsky...except perhaps to learn from his expertise in community organizing. Surely you darlings don't think the rest of us should just sit quietly through your revolutionary antics, now do you? Destroy...guns, culture, religion, philosophy, education system, total dependence on Big Brother. And Steve, darling, what in the world do you have against grandmothers?? Usually they are the last on your totem poles, you little fearless wonders!

Greg G.

11:20 pm on Saturday, December 22, 2012

FIFA...what you may not know that I pointed out earlier. The AR-15 can be converted to full auto in about 15 minutes with no background check at all! Pretty horrific! Go to one of the gun shows in VA and simply buy the firing mechanism for an M-16 which requires no background check. File some parts and drop it into the AR-15 and you now have a full auto with no paperwork. Thank God this kid only had half a brain. The .223 was also used by the DC sniper so I fully back you on this. No private citizen needs combat style firepower like this. We are not at ground zero in Syria, there are not hordes of Zombies pounding at the door last I checked, and the end of the world came and went yesterday. All these people say is I like to target practice with it. Really? Go buy a competition .22 it's much cheaper.

Reply

Chris W

9:17 am on Sunday, December 23, 2012

Greg, people like you are the reason that the founders made the right to bear arms a constitutional right. The constitution lists and describes those rights that the folders felt were inherent to everyone. There are rights that they felt no government should be able to take away. They did recognize that things chage over time and provided a mechanism to change the constitution. That process is available. Until such time ase the conststution is amended,the right to bear arms is here to stay.

I also thik it's ironic that liberals are happy that the SCOTUS difined a right out of thin air in the 70s (roe v Wade), and then spend their days trying to deny rights that are actually spelled out in the constitution.

Reply
Comment_arrow

1ke

9:41 am on Sunday, December 23, 2012

Two things:
1. Kindly copy and paste into a post the Second Amendment to convince anyone who may question your absolute commitment to principle.
2. Say with a straight face that a firearm you may own is not just a piece of slick mechanism that is just another boy-toy that goes with your four-wheeler, your pick-up truck, your Ravens stuff and deals out Death to anybody who Invades your castle to violate and sell into human bondage you and your family.

Do these things and henceforth, I will refer to you as Chris W. Defender of the Republic.

Comment_arrow

Chris W

5:07 pm on Sunday, December 23, 2012

Frank, predictive text on the iPad is often as accurate as a meteorologist.

It's easy not to make a spelling error when your posts are the equivalent of " I know you are but what am I."

Buck Harmon

9:29 am on Sunday, December 23, 2012

Any perceived law that violates the Constitution is simply a non law...
Our Government has a track record of mass failure....it has also been involved in mass murder, both at home and abroad....kinda weird when you think about it...don't think I'll be surrendering anything to that type of structure...personal choices trump perceived law... that feels like freedom to me..

Reply

1ke

9:56 am on Sunday, December 23, 2012

Lorna, if can't cozy up next to Saul Alinsky, you probably have qualms about William Bradford, Samuel Adams, William Lloyd Garrison, John Brown, Samuel Gompers, William McKinley, Thurgood Marshall, Daniel Ellsburg and Ralph Nader.

These are all Americans who took the vague but noble precepts of democratic action and put them to work for everyday people who deserved better than they were getting

You need to get in the game if you actually have something that you do believe in except the wish-fulfillment predators that seem to lurk beneath your every posting.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lorna D. Rudnikas

10:32 am on Sunday, December 23, 2012

So you have put old Saul in with Sam Adams, Ralph Nader and Thurgood Marshall...I find your thought process a little mind boggling and a bit of stretch honey child. As for your assessment of me...quite a bit off base. To get into your game would be against all I believe in. You and your cohorts look for weak links and pounce with a head one view of destruction...a process that will affect us all darling in a very negative way. Actually, I am being very kind with my words honey child. Been there, seen revolution...anyone who plays the GAME in destroying this country and who wins that GAME, would ultimately be the first to be thrown off the bridge post GAME by the elite GAME players. If you try to destroy the greatest country on earth, of what use will you be if you win the GAME...you would not be cost effective, darling! And that, honey child is how it works. Better give a little more thought to your GAME PLANS!!

Comment_arrow

1ke

12:23 pm on Sunday, December 23, 2012

I am already consulting Flying Dog Grand Cru and Lagunitas Lil' Sumpin'. Does that make me multicultural?

Sanchez

10:21 am on Sunday, December 23, 2012

The racists and gun grabbers are as rabid as dogs.

"MSNBC: People Against Gun Control Are Scared Of “Black And Brown People” Rising Up To Get Them…
Shockingly, this is the same UPenn professor who called for the filmmaker behind “Innocence of Muslims” to be locked up for making the movie."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELNML7iyQG8&feature=player_embedded

"CNN's Don Lemon On Gun Control: Should We Start Profiling White Men?"
"CNN's Don Lemon discusses the possibility of profiling white men in an attempt to prevent gun violence and decrease the amount of mass shootings. Lemon argues that white males between the ages of 18 and 25 were behind nearly all recent mass killings."
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/12/23/cnns_don_lemon_on_gun_control_should_we_start_profiling_white_men.html

Reply

Sanchez

10:21 am on Sunday, December 23, 2012

Statistics from the FBI UCS
Black males are about 7.5% of the total population of America and commit about 38% of all murders. 43% of all murder victims are black males. 50% of all murder victims are black.
In 2011 there were 8583 murders by firearm. 3353 were murdered by being beaten to death with hands feet.
442 sons and daughters were murdered by their mothers or fathers in 2011.
Rifles were used in only 2.4% of all murders in 2011. Handguns in 50% and knives and cutting instruments in 13%.

"Assault weapon" is not even a statistical parameter in the FBI stats since they are so little used in crime.
"Assault weapons" are not the problem when it comes to the carnage of gun crime.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Buck Harmon

10:27 am on Sunday, December 23, 2012

The government wants control of these weapons for their own safety...not the safety of U S citizens..

Sanchez

10:28 am on Sunday, December 23, 2012

Are we going to include the MASS of these shootings in our conversation Mr Cardin?

"Shooting and crash linked to Air Jordan shoes
A man was shot and then crashed a car Friday after two people demanded his newly purchased Nike Air Jordan shoes, Harris County officials said.
The man was discovered shot about 10:30 a.m. in the 1700 block of Plumwood near Hallfield, according to the Harris County Sheriff's Office. He was taken to Houston Northwest Medical Center. His condition was not released, but deputies said he had a life-threatening gunshot wound.
Deputies said the man and another man had just returned to one of their homes from Willowbrook Mall, where they had bought Air Jordan XI "Bred" tennis shoes. As the driver pulled up to the front of his home, two men in a green, four-door vehicle pulled in front of them. An armed man got out of the car, deputies said, approached the men and demanded their new shoes.
The driver ran, and the gunman opened fire on him. The driver was not hurt.
As the passenger tried to drive away, a second armed man opened fire on him, wounding him."

"Teens shot and killed Pa. woman over cigarette, police say
A western Pennsylvania mother was shot and killed after she told three teens to "get a job" when she saw them trying to bum a cigarette off her boyfriend, police say."

"Two teens killed, 24 others wounded across Chicago
October 14, 2012"

Is this a part of the conversation Mr Cardin? This is where the mass killings take place.

Reply

Lorna D. Rudnikas

10:41 am on Sunday, December 23, 2012

Sorry Buck..you are so very right about not answering...I guess I lost control. Yikes!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Buck Harmon

10:49 am on Sunday, December 23, 2012

It's all for good anyway...Honeychild... you just sweeten the threads a bit...firm~but sweet...Best of the Holidays to you !!

1ke

11:11 am on Sunday, December 23, 2012

Yo, this has taken a dark turn. Defenders of the American Way. You all are hardcore Teabaggers and deeply paranoid. Speak to each other in meta-language. "Shh, Lorna, they might be logging our IP addresses." "Yikes, Buck, discipline. I've got to stay focused, retain, retain." http://bit.ly/UU0aEA

Reply
Comment_arrow

Steve

11:29 am on Sunday, December 23, 2012

"Defenders of the American Way" It's a part of the Resist-A-Nut Nation. These people crack me up.

http://patriotaction.net/group/marylandresistance

Now we know where all the Jerry Springer people hide out.

Comment_arrow

Steve

4:29 pm on Sunday, December 23, 2012

You can get it. Just download the Anti Same Sex Marriage/Anti Illegal Haterbase that they created with the referendums. They are all on there.

Comment_arrow

Lorna D. Rudnikas

5:18 pm on Sunday, December 23, 2012

Dearest 1ke....you really, really know not what you speak. Meta, beta, feta...think you are losing it pal. This is getting more fun with every response. Go guys, (and perhaps gals) go!!!! Come on back out from under the rocks. We have missed your "before the election" crap.

1ke

12:18 pm on Sunday, December 23, 2012

I'd rather have a home invasion than a door-to-door visit from one of this crowd.

Why has it taken so long for these goofballs to out like this? I guess an election in which their contingent was crushed and a political process involving the sequestration has flooded their warren. Varmints everywhere. Get 'em Saul. Get 'em Casey Foundation. Get 'em Safe and Sound. Get 'em BUILD. Get 'em Baltimore Ministerial Alliance. Get 'em Parks and People. Get 'em OSI.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lorna D. Rudnikas

5:14 pm on Sunday, December 23, 2012

Holy cow, you guys (maybe gals) are on a role. Darling, be it known right now, that we are praying the country we love will not be crushed. Listening to you angels is "red flag" time. Double Yikes!!! Your aggressive words are so, so telling honey child. If only the rest of us would not have to go through the wringer...just you and your friends..now that would be lovely to watch.

Steve

12:28 pm on Sunday, December 23, 2012

It was when we elected a Black Man President. The first time they self deluded themselves that it was a fluke. The second time they can't use that excuse. Now they are just Batshit Crazy.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lorna D. Rudnikas

5:10 pm on Sunday, December 23, 2012

I know you wish that concerns stem from the fact the Mr. Obama is black (or is it half black and half white)...but I am afraid that crap from you is old. Has absolutely nothing to do with facts. Sorry, you will have to play something other than the race card. You are not quite as intelligent as you would have other believe. But, whatever makes you enjoy a certain pseudo-comfort zone in your racist zone world, it would be unkind of the rest of us to take it away from you. And so, I say put those rose-colored glasses right back on darling and have a beautiful Christmas and wonderful New Year!!

Comment_arrow

Chris W

8:03 am on Monday, December 24, 2012

Steve, most Republicans could care less about ehat race the president is. Many liked Herman Cain and its hard to find a Republicant who does not like Condi Rice.

Your constant whining that republicans are racist is a tiresome generalization.

Most Republicans dislike the president because of his liberal /socialist policies, and because he would rather double down on the policies that have us borrowing 41 cents of every dollars we spend.

Comment_arrow

Chris W

9:25 am on Monday, December 24, 2012

Frank your post simply supports my point. All this race baiting by you, Steve, Et al. Has nothing to do with race and everything to do with politics.

Any conservative black is ridiculed, called an uncle Tom etc. meanwhile Jackson, Sharpton and their ilk are revered because you like their politics.

It so transparent.

Comment_arrow

Sanchez

11:23 am on Monday, December 24, 2012

"Five sad, misguided tokens"

As racist a comment as any on this entire page.

Not only is THAT a typical racist comment but then he adds another.
"Sorry, Chris, you'll have to do better than that before you can turn in your white sheets."

Any black not black enough for this racist Frank is a "token" and all whites who see them as good decent people are racist as well according to the real racist here, Frank. Why else would he think all those wear "white sheets"?

Frank is one of the most racist bigoted intolerant person here.
"Jesus and the Apostles = Misfit Patrol?"

""mass murders are committed by young mails."
I see I missed Brunch at Castle Bueller."

"Thank G-d for Microsoft Word." As if the word GOD is like the "N-word"

"the reason I asked is because many on your ilk, those who form their opinions based on whatever Glenn Beck tells them,"

and on and on and on.......

Comment_arrow

Chris W

12:32 pm on Monday, December 24, 2012

And while some folks get their accounts a suspended for masked profanity, Steve and Frank get away with their overt racist drivel.

Last I checked, one of the patch terms of use addresses this as well:
"threatening, harassing or that promotes racism, bigotry, hatred or physical harm of any kind against any group or individual;"

Editor?

Steve

4:11 pm on Sunday, December 23, 2012

LOL Now we find out from his son that Mitt Romney didn't really want to win...

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lorna D. Rudnikas

5:06 pm on Sunday, December 23, 2012

Ahh darling Steve, he who laughs last, laughs best....but in this case the pain will much to great to laugh about at all. Perhaps a knowing smile will be all we can muster.

Comment_arrow

Steve

9:16 am on Monday, December 24, 2012

LOL Then there are some really out there groups barely clinging on the far edges of Wing Nuttery. Like these guys.....

http://www.facebook.com/OBAMAAGAINSTCHRISTIANS

Buck Harmon

4:30 pm on Sunday, December 23, 2012

My thoughts have always been that our once great Country would continue to get screwed regardless of which goof was elected..the chips fell...screwing continues...cliff hanger..the pigeons are restless...)

Reply

1ke

5:22 pm on Sunday, December 23, 2012

"...Mr. Obama is black (or is it half black and half white)..." This is racist discourse, no question about it. Someone who by their own description is not a racist ought to either purge it from their written communication or wear the label proudly.

Then, you could write your next screed about quadroons and octoroons and further explore your fraction skills. Really ignorant, Lorna.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lorna D. Rudnikas

5:35 pm on Sunday, December 23, 2012

I wanted to take a break...but your idiotic comments are so compelling. You would not know "ignorant" if you fell over it. You are so racially inept darling...you have been left behind in the dust. Why do you insist that Mr. Obama is "black?" Just curious. And so what if he is or is not? Why is his race so very important to you? It is mind boggling. It is like you just came out of a cave. Trying to hold a reasonable conversation with you is like trying to get blood out of a turnip! Please just swallow your race card or stick it up your butt-a-voo.

Comment_arrow

Buck Harmon

8:58 am on Tuesday, December 25, 2012

Compromise...our President is grey..

Lorna D. Rudnikas

5:24 pm on Sunday, December 23, 2012

Of course, they will not reap what they have sown. For those that deserve it, I could not be happier. Give me a measure of solace, actually. Hope that doesn't mean I am revengeful....couldn't mean that, could it??? Certainly not after I have criticized our President for using such a term. Whew,, hope such bad thoughts are catching!!!

Reply

Lorna D. Rudnikas

5:25 pm on Sunday, December 23, 2012

Oh heck...correction...they WILL REAP what they have sown...

Reply

Lorna D. Rudnikas

5:26 pm on Sunday, December 23, 2012

oops...another correction....hope such bad thoughts ARE NOT catching...Oh oh, was that a "freudian" slip??? I better take a break folks.

Reply

Lorna D. Rudnikas

5:49 pm on Sunday, December 23, 2012

Sorry...just catching up with you Frank, responding to: "Lorna, the reason I asked is because many on your ilk, those who form their opinions based on whatever Glenn Beck tells them, think that "anti-colonialism" was good when the Founding Fathers practiced it, but bad when the President's father practiced it. I was wondering if you could explain this dichotomy." First and foremost darling Frank, stop talking "ilk" like a gossipy wet hen...second and important to your comments, haven't a clue what Glen Beck says or how he says it, and certainly not the least bit interested in Mr. Obama's father...what he did, said or aspired to be and the level of sobriety he may have enjoyed in his life time. I know one thing, Mr. Obama's mother was caucasian and his father a black man from Africa. So what???

Reply

Lorna D. Rudnikas

5:58 pm on Sunday, December 23, 2012

As for anti-colonialism...perhaps you are not reading my responses as clearly as I had hoped for. I am anti any thing or living creature who is anti-America. Got it?? If not, get it? Twist it, turn it, sing it...anyway you want. With those thoughts in mind, place your boring anti-America and perhaps anti-christian philosophy crap at the door of someone else. The thoughts of you and your 'ILK" are not new...perhaps not taken as seriously as they should be by many in our dear country, but history has shown disasterous if they are permitted to ferment and take hold. Please do share your exquisite thoughts about anti-colonialism..and do be specific honey c hild

Reply

1ke

6:12 pm on Sunday, December 23, 2012

Look at your sorry self dance. Stumbling. Fumbling. Passive aggressive.

Do you study history much or snuggle up with end-times, fascist websites?

I have heard nothing but this know-it-all doomsayer shtick. Is this it? All you have?

Reply

Lorna D. Rudnikas

6:20 pm on Sunday, December 23, 2012

ha, ha, you are precious! No darling, it is all that your tiny brain can handle. Snuggling, stumbling, fumbling, fascist....love it! Pathetique..but I love it!!! If you had not responded in this manner, I would have been very, very disappointed in you. Thanks for being so, so you, honey child.

Reply

Sanchez

11:15 am on Monday, December 24, 2012

"David Gregory mocked the NRA's Wayne LaPierre for proposing that armed guards be at every school in America. But the NBC host seems to have no problem with armed guards protecting his kids everyday where they attend school in Washington, D.C."

David Gregory on Meet the Press, waving around an ILLEGAL high cap mag on national television.

DC High Capacity Ammunition Magazines – D.C. Official Code 7-2506.01

(b) No person in the District shall possess, sell, or transfer any large capacity ammunition feeding device regardless of whether the device is attached to a firearm. For the purposes of this subsection, the term large capacity ammunition feeding device means a magazine, belt, drum, feed strip, or similar device that has a capacity of, or that can be readily restored or converted to accept, more than 10 rounds of ammunition. The term large capacity ammunition feeding device shall not include an attached tubular device designed to accept, and capable of operating only with, .22 caliber rimfire ammunition.

The true gun-nutters. Violating Washington DC firearm laws in order to propagandize the issue. Time for Kathy Lanier to send her officers to visit and arrest this violator as she has with our military men.

Reply

Steve

11:37 am on Monday, December 24, 2012

More Copy pasta from Joe. You lifted that verbatim from the Welfare Pimp vanderboegh's site.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sanchez

11:52 am on Monday, December 24, 2012

Did David Gregory wave a hi cap mag on the air or didn't he Steve?

Simple question.

Comment_arrow

Steve

1:42 pm on Monday, December 24, 2012

The NRA really has you guys tilting at Windmills these days don't they?

Sanchez

11:53 am on Monday, December 24, 2012

Steve is not here for civil adult discussion but to impugn the worst possible motive to those he disagrees with. He shows all who read his comments the definition of BIGOT with his "grouping" of different people he does not like. All gun owners are "gun nutters" etc etc ad neauseum.

"Then there are some really out there groups barely clinging on the far edges of Wing Nuttery."

"You :
1. Gun Nutter
2. Camouflage Wearer
3. GED Candidate
4. Trailer Park Resident"

"You guys must be members of the same cross burning groups."

"Get over it. You lost. Your next watershed event will be when "Honey Boo Boo" gets cancelled."

"2013 is going to be a big year for you Beeker. Your age will actually match your IQ."

"You Crazy White Guys speaking in code "Thoughtful discourse" means losing the argument..."

"It's the Bitter Old White Guy Flat Earth Society Crap. It's ridiculous."

"Like I said, these people are Batshit Crazy...."

"Just download the Anti Same Sex Marriage/Anti Illegal Haterbase that they created with the referendums. They are all on there."

"A piece of paper written hundreds of years ago by a bunch of old besotted white guys needs a little updating anyway."

This could go on and on and on. Steve is here for therapy, not for civil discourse.

Reply

Steve

1:51 pm on Monday, December 24, 2012

Over 100 Americans have been shot and killed since the Sandy Hook massacre.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/21/us-shooting-deaths-sandy-hook_n_2348466.html

That's just plain nuts!

Reply

Steve

6:34 pm on Monday, December 24, 2012

That makes absolutely no sense......

Reply

Steve

7:28 pm on Monday, December 24, 2012

I wonder if the names and addresses of firearms owners are public knowledge in Maryland like they are in New York?

http://www.lohud.com/interactive/article/20121223/NEWS01/121221011/Map-Where-gun-permits-your-neighborhood-

Reply

Sanchez

8:03 pm on Monday, December 24, 2012

"Grossman’s Five D’s
Let’s contemplate the following outline and summary of Dave Grossman’s “Five D’s.” While you do, I encourage you to add in the comments area below your suggestions to address, and expand upon, these ideas.

1. Denial — Denial is the enemy and it has no survival value, said Grossman.

2. Deter — Put police officers in schools, because with just one officer assigned to a school, the probability of a mass murder in that school drops to almost zero

3. Detect — We’re talking about plain old fashioned police work here. The ultimate achievement for law enforcement is the crime that didn’t happen, so giving teachers and administrators regular access to cops is paramount.

4. Delay — Various simple mechanisms can be used by teachers and cops to put time and distance between the killers and the kids.

a. Ensure that the school/classroom have just a single point of entry. Simply locking the back door helps create a hard target.
b. Conduct your active shooter drills within (and in partnership with) the schools in your city so teachers know how to respond, and know what it looks like when you do your response."

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sanchez

8:04 pm on Monday, December 24, 2012

"5. Destroy — Police officers and agencies should consider the following:

a. Carry off duty. No one would tell a firefighter who has a fire extinguisher in his trunk that he’s crazy or paranoid.
b. Equip every cop in America with a patrol rifle. One chief of police, upon getting rifles for all his officers once said, “If an active killer strikes in my town, the response time will be measured in feet per second.”
c. Put smoke grenades in the trunk of every cop car in America. Any infantryman who needs to attack across open terrain or perform a rescue under fire deploys a smoke grenade. A fire extinguisher will do a decent job in some cases, but a smoke grenade is designed to perform the function.
d. Have a “go-to-war bag” filled with lots of loaded magazines and supplies for tactical combat casualty care.

Comment_arrow

Sanchez

8:04 pm on Monday, December 24, 2012

"e. Use helicopters. Somewhere in your county you probably have one or more of the following: medevac, media, private, national guard, coast guard rotors.
f. Employ the crew-served, continuous-feed, weapon you already have available to you (a firehouse) by integrating the fire service into your active shooter training. It is virtually impossible for a killer to put well-placed shots on target while also being blasted with water at 300 pounds per square inch.
g. Armed citizens can help. Think United 93. Whatever your personal take on gun control, it is all but certain that a killer set on killing is more likely to attack a target where the citizens are unarmed, rather than one where they are likely to encounter an armed citizen response."

http://www.policeone.com/active-shooter/articles/2058168-Lt-Col-Dave-Grossman-to-cops-The-enemy-is-denial/

Solid ideas from the professionals.

Sanchez

8:05 pm on Monday, December 24, 2012

"Arming Campus Cops is Elementary
Nearly two years ago, I wrote an article called Arming campus cops is elementary. Not surprisingly, Grossman agrees with that hypothesis.

“Never call an unarmed man ‘security’,” Grossman said.

“Call him ‘run-like-hell-when-the-man-with-the-gun-shows-up’ but never call an unarmed man security."

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sanchez

8:06 pm on Monday, December 24, 2012

""Imagine if someone said, ‘I want a trained fire professional on site. I want a fire hat, I want a fire uniform, I want a fire badge. But! No fire extinguishers in this building. No fire hoses. The hat, the badge, the uniform — that will keep us safe — but we have no need for fire extinguishers.’ Well, that would be insane. It is equally insane, delusional, legally liable, to say, ‘I want a trained security professional on site. I want a security hat, I want a security uniform, and I want a security badge, but I don’t want a gun.’ It’s not the hat, the uniform, or the badge. It’s the tools in the hands of a trained professional that keeps us safe.

“Our problem is not money,” said Grossman. “It is denial.”

Grossman said (and most cops agree) that many of the most important things we can do to protect our kids would cost us nothing or next-to-nothing."

Merry Christmas to all.

jnrentz1

6:39 am on Tuesday, December 25, 2012

Merry Christmas.

Happy New Year.

Peace to all.

Reply

Sanchez

9:41 am on Tuesday, December 25, 2012

Too bad those railing against such an idea are ignorant of the facts and seem unwilling to learn the facts since it would destroy their emotional reactions to these stories.

New York Times N.R.A. Envisions ‘a Good Guy With a Gun’ in Every School
December 21, 2012

"Nationwide, at least 23,000 schools — about one-third of all public schools — already had armed security on staff as of the most recent data, for the 2009-10 school year, and a number of states and districts that do not use them have begun discussing the idea in recent days. "

Merry Christmas to all and to all stockings full of rational thought and peace to your fellow man.

Reply

Sanchez

9:57 am on Tuesday, December 25, 2012

This is what some say about Christmas.

"Nancy Snyderman, NBC's chief medical editor, on the Today Show, Snyderman stated that "I don't like the religion part" of Christmas. "I think that's what makes the holidays so stressful." Snyderman would prefer to concentrate on the "green trees.""
http://www.westernjournalism.com/nbc-denounces-religious-part-of-christmas/

And we wonder why we are becoming an immoral nation.

Reply
Comment_arrow

FIFA_archived

11:27 am on Tuesday, December 25, 2012

You confuse being non-religious with morality. I would argue that many religious people are immoral as Americans see morality. You are only as moral as you define the term.

Comment_arrow

Lorna D. Rudnikas

11:17 pm on Tuesday, December 25, 2012

Sanchez...in the end, who gives a rat's fuzzy butt about what Nancy Snyderman likes or dislikes, thinks or doesn't think about Christmas. Perhaps, since she is Jewish, she could share her thoughts about Hanukkha

Steve

10:36 am on Tuesday, December 25, 2012

Tell the truth JoeBlob. 1st Sergeant Matthew Corrigan had called a Suicide Hotline and threatened to kill himself. That's why the cops went to his house in the first place.

He should thank them for getting him committed. Consider the alternative...

Reply

1ke

11:36 am on Tuesday, December 25, 2012

Not to COPY & PASTE, but you can get the entire study at http://bit.ly/RgBQyX

• The US public is the leading world market for US and most non-US firearms
manufacturers.
• The US public holds about 230,000,000–280,000,000 guns—at least one out
of every three guns in the world, and nearly one gun per per person in the
United States.
• The US military holds approximately 3,600,000 small arms—1.38 guns per
uniformed serviceperson.

Reply

FIFA_archived

11:52 am on Tuesday, December 25, 2012

It appears LaPierre either lied or didn't know, wonder which it was, when he appeared on Meet the Press and suggested armed guards in Israeli schools were the answer to "mass shootings"? The Israelis disagree with LaPierre, shocking.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/israelis-shoot-nra-claim-article-1.1226401

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sanchez

1:36 pm on Tuesday, December 25, 2012

THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICERS (NASRO)
agrees with the NRA as did President Clinton and so do 1/3rd of existing schools who have armed school resource officers today.

Sanchez

1:28 pm on Tuesday, December 25, 2012

http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/eAgendaViewRule?pubId=201210&RIN=1140-AA44

Obama regime with AG Holder, the International Firearm Dealer to the Sinola Drug Cartel, are fighting to loosen the laws for aliens lawfully present in the United States. And to TIGHTEN the rules for natural born citizens.

DOJ/ATF RIN: 1140-AA44 Publication ID: 2012
Title: ●Residency Requirements for Aliens Acquiring Firearms
Abstract: This rule would finalize the interim final rule published on June 7, 2012 by removing the 90-day State residency requirement for aliens lawfully present in the United States to purchase or acquire a firearm. The Department has determined that the Gun Control Act does not permit ATF to impose a regulatory requirement that aliens lawfully present in the United States are subject to a 90-day State residency requirement when such a requirement is not applicable to U.S. citizens.
Agency: Department of Justice(DOJ) Priority: Other Significant
RIN Status: First time published in the Unified Agenda Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Stage

Reply

Sanchez

1:30 pm on Tuesday, December 25, 2012

http://www.nasro.org/content/press-release-connecticut-elementary-school-shooting
THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICERS (NASRO)

"PRESS RELEASE - Connecticut Elementary School Shooting

NASRO responds to NRA recommendations

Dec, 21, 2012 – Hoover, Ala. – The National Association of School Resource Officers (NASRO) today responded to school safety recommendations announced by the National Rifle Association (NRA).

QUOTES FROM MR. MO CANADY, EXEC. DIR., NASRO & FORMER SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER

“A well-trained, armed, school-based police officer is one of the best defenses against an active shooter in a school. NASRO agrees that placing school-based police officers in every school that wants one would greatly enhance the safety of children, if such officers are selected carefully and properly trained.”

“School-based policing requires specialized training not covered in most law enforcement academies. Because school resource officers are much more than armed guards, they need training in teaching, counseling and the special skills required to act as a law enforcement officer in a school setting. In addition, we recommend that all school resource officers receive special training to assure that their responses to an active shooter will be safe and effective.” "

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sanchez

1:30 pm on Tuesday, December 25, 2012

"Q: Does NASRO agree that every school that wants one should have an armed police officer?

A: Yes, when local communities deem it necessary. A well-trained, armed, school resource officer (SRO) is one of the best defenses against an active shooter. NASRO provides specialized training to school-based police officers on how to properly respond to an active shooter in a sound way."

Sanchez

1:34 pm on Tuesday, December 25, 2012

"Washington D.C. Police Chief Cathy Lanier has confirmed that the department is looking into allegations that NBC's David Gregory violated D.C.'s gun banning laws during a recent taping of Meet the Press.
Breitbart contacted the office of the police chief and asked if there were any plans to look into this apparent violation of the District's gun laws. In response, Chief Lanier replied, "Yes, we are investigating the incident to determine if the magazine was in fact real."

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sanchez

1:35 pm on Tuesday, December 25, 2012

The NRA has Police Chief Lanier tilting at windmills?

kevin

1:45 am on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

I wonder since losing the house in 2010 Obama has cut federal funding from $792 million a year end to $199 million last year for public safety funds which supplied school safety programs including armed security. By the way Mr. Obama CUT those funds he purposely did not put them into the budget and put the money in other programs to raise test scores.Which have proven to be misused funds manipulatedby various groups to get teachers raises and pay for Special Interest organizations. What would $600 million last year alone accomplished with the Conn. Shootings? I don't know but one of the requirements were schools were forced to consistently demonstrate security improvements ,drill and prove that funding was being used. With recent findings of scandalous test fixing and rewarding teachers for teaching children exactly what was on test being a failure.Why don't we try and put the almost $600 million back into security? Oh that's right Obama will decrease school security funding in his budget cutback proposal . Yeah Let's strenghten gun laws.Seems like all the cuts Mr. Obama has instituted since he lost house are working out GREAT. before you say it was a republican house who cut it do your homework all cuts were results of Mr. Obama proposed spending packages not house leadership.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Buck Harmon

8:48 am on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Are you wearing the three corner or dunce cap version today Fifi..?

Comment_arrow

FIFA_archived

9:06 am on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Here come Buckaroo with this 9/11 conspiracy theories and income taxes are unconstitutional and he calls me dumb? C'mon Bucky, what else is in your bag of tricks.

Comment_arrow

Native

9:14 am on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Yeah, typical liberal. Instead of debating with facts, he resorts to namecalling.

Comment_arrow

1ke

9:19 am on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

I'm reading and haven't seen a so-called fact yet.

Comment_arrow

Buck Harmon

9:26 am on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

I seek facts..truth Fifi, previous attempts by you to back some of the claims that you have made have failed miserably...you are not capable of proving that which is not true...It's the dunce cap for you...good luck ..follow the leader...it will all work out...pay more tax...kiss more butt...seems to be your solution..

Comment_arrow

FIFA_archived

9:39 am on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Bucky Baby, you want me to prove your nutty claims are false? You have it back asswards. You make the claim, prove it.

Chris W

7:50 am on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

So everyone was quick to slam the NRA president for suggesting that schools have security guards or police, meanwhile it's reported that Sidwell friends school has 11 security officers. This is the school that the Obamas send their kids to.

This securuty is not just for the Obamas, many well connected families send their kids to Sidwell.

It's also ironic since Sidwell is a Quaker school.

Reply
Comment_arrow

FIFA_archived

9:10 am on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

This probably has a lot more to do with terrorist/hostage than a random shooter. The kidnapping/killing of well to do people is not the target of the random killer.

The NRA president is crazy. If one thinks through the effects you will see the problems. Soft targets exist everywhere in the US, not just schools. Those security officers in schools now are usually only there during the school day. Not at sporting events, concerts, etc.

Comment_arrow

1ke

9:23 am on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

I don't know about you, Chris W, because you may be really important and really wealthy. But I don't think that anyone would kidnap my children and hold them for ransom. The taxpayers ought to pit their foot down and stop supporting schools like Sidwell Friends.

Comment_arrow

Buck Harmon

9:31 am on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Good point Chris W, and Fifi...can you prove your statement regarding security not being present at sporting events, or is the use of the word "usually" a tiptoe around facts?
You do this often Fifi...show us some fact...

Comment_arrow

FIFA_archived

9:36 am on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Just go to a football game on any weekend in Perry Hall at the Elementary School. There are hundreds of people and kids throughout the day. That is a soft target. You can have security there too? How about baseball and soccer games. How about all of the tournaments where thousands of kids are? You guys are silly.

Comment_arrow

FIFA_archived

9:38 am on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Bucky Baby, go to a Ravens football game and the tailgate party has hundreds and hundreds of people. A person with a 90 round magazine and a .223 Remington will empty before stopped. So much for security.

Comment_arrow

Buck Harmon

9:53 am on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Fifi, Once again you fail...we are responding to Chris W comment regarding the Quaker School that Obama's kids attend...please pay more attention to the portion of the thread that you respond to...go back ..re read..stop making more of an as of yourself for a happy new year change...I know it's hard for you to keep up with your own silliness...but please try a little harder for the sake of the thread...
Just pushing your buttons...time to wake up..!

Comment_arrow

FIFA_archived

10:05 am on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Bucky baby, maybe you are losing it. The thread shows I responded to Chris on point then you decided to go whacko on us with your normal conspiracy BS theories.

Go put your white jacket back on please.

Comment_arrow

Buck Harmon

10:21 am on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

There you go again Fifi...since when is seeking the truth, (especially when it pertains to government) a conspiracy? Seeking the truth, as well as a degree of accountability is American. Do you believe all things spewed by government..? If you do you are wearing sheepskin...

Comment_arrow

Sanchez

10:23 am on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

For those who say "if one thinks through the effects you will see the problems"
as if the one who said that is the expert and more knowledgeable than the true professionals.

"Dec, 21, 2012 – Hoover, Ala. – The National Association of School Resource Officers (NASRO) today responded to school safety recommendations announced by the National Rifle Association (NRA).

QUOTES FROM MR. MO CANADY, EXEC. DIR., NASRO & FORMER SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER

“A well-trained, armed, school-based police officer is one of the best defenses against an active shooter in a school. NASRO agrees that placing school-based police officers in every school that wants one would greatly enhance the safety of children, if such officers are selected carefully and properly trained.”

“School-based policing requires specialized training not covered in most law enforcement academies. Because school resource officers are much more than armed guards, they need training in teaching, counseling and the special skills required to act as a law enforcement officer in a school setting. In addition, we recommend that all school resource officers receive special training to assure that their responses to an active shooter will be safe and effective.” "

Comment_arrow

Sanchez

10:26 am on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Here are some professionals who HAVE thought it through, not just an empty thought form a blowhard.

""Q: Does NASRO agree that every school that wants one should have an armed police officer?

A: Yes, when local communities deem it necessary. A well-trained, armed, school resource officer (SRO) is one of the best defenses against an active shooter. NASRO provides specialized training to school-based police officers on how to properly respond to an active shooter in a sound way.""

Comment_arrow

Steve

10:52 am on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

10 of the 11 "Security Guards" are Secret Service agents.

Before you go "Blah, Blah Blah" my daughter teaches there and my wife is an Alumni.

Comment_arrow

Chris W

2:00 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Does no one see the hypocrisy of having 11 armed guards at YOUR kids school while telling everyone else that armed guards at schools is not a solution?

Comment_arrow

Steve

2:11 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Don't be stupid.

The President of the United States daughters attend that school. 10 SS agents are there to protect them. The same number that had to chase the party animal Bush girl's around..

1ke

9:26 am on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Why isn't anyone talking about a well-armed student body? I taught in a school like that. Over a twenty-year period there were only three shots fired in the building and they were all accidental.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sanchez

10:37 am on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Wanna talk about a "well armed student body"? Lets look at Chicago.

Chicago Public School Students Shot This School Year Highest Since 2008.

440+ School Age Children Shot in Gun-Controlled Chicago in the 2012 school year.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/26/chicago-public-school-stu_n_1627258.html

The result of a "well armed student body" in an urban setting is the NEW American gun culture.

The old American gun culture was was what built America.

Comment_arrow

Sanchez

10:39 am on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

1 Dead, 13 Wounded In Christmas Eve, Christmas Shootings.

"CHICAGO (STMW) – One person was killed and 13 wounded in gun violence over the Christmas holiday, including an 11-year-old boy grazed by a bullet and a man who was shot to death during a dispute in the Englewood neighborhood.

Joshua Davis, 18, was shot to death in the 2000 block of W. 69th Street — a few blocks from his home — after an altercation with several males on a CTA bus, according to the Cook County Medical Examiner’s office.

The group followed Davis off the bus when one of the males pulled out a handgun and shot Davis several times in the torso and once in the ear about 11:30 p.m. Tuesday, authorities said."

Comment_arrow

1ke

11:41 am on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Oh, the OLD American gun culture! I see.

But, perfessor, would you explain the differences in sociological terms between the Old Gun Culture and the New Gun Culture?

Oh, but don't get pissed. Please don't.

mighty1

10:00 am on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

When you are born in America you should be given a SS# and a hand gun.The trick is you only get twenty-five shells for your lifetime.If you are found in possession of to many shells or guns you should be executed within a week of your arrest.Of course you'll get a chance at the firing range on a semi-annual basis with the shells being provided on site at the time of your scheduled appointment.Everyone gets a carry permit.In every arguement about almost everything everyone wants a level playing field,well there it is.You have a God given right to defend yourself and no government should have the right to deny you that right.Every man is his own steward,the calvary does not always arrive on time.

Reply

Sanchez

10:26 am on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

For those who say "if one thinks through the effects you will see the problems"
as if the one who said that is the expert and more knowledgeable than the true professionals.

"Dec, 21, 2012 – Hoover, Ala. – The National Association of School Resource Officers (NASRO) today responded to school safety recommendations announced by the National Rifle Association (NRA).

QUOTES FROM MR. MO CANADY, EXEC. DIR., NASRO & FORMER SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER

“A well-trained, armed, school-based police officer is one of the best defenses against an active shooter in a school. NASRO agrees that placing school-based police officers in every school that wants one would greatly enhance the safety of children, if such officers are selected carefully and properly trained.”

“School-based policing requires specialized training not covered in most law enforcement academies. Because school resource officers are much more than armed guards, they need training in teaching, counseling and the special skills required to act as a law enforcement officer in a school setting. In addition, we recommend that all school resource officers receive special training to assure that their responses to an active shooter will be safe and effective.” "

Reply

Sanchez

10:32 am on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

How about this idea? Since 38% of all murders are committed by less than 6% of all people, try this out considering the revolving door of the Justice system most are oft repeaters.

Any display or threat of a firearm in the commission of a misdemeanor or felony, is an automatic 10 years in prison, no good time, no parole. This sentence MUST be served consecutively not concurrently to any other sentence form the original crime.

Any discharge of a firearm in the commission of a misdemeanor or felony, is an automatic 20 or 25 years in prison, no good time, no parole. This sentence MUST be served consecutively not concurrently to any other sentence form the original crime.

This will only affect those who abuse their rights in evil ways. It will not effect the 99.9999% of those of us who exercise our rights lawfully.

Reply

Sanchez

10:50 am on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Read the timeline of the incident at Columbine. See how the ARMED School Resource Office Gardiner SAVED LIVES!

http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2000/columbine.cd/Pages/NARRATIVE.Time.Line.htm

". As Gardner steps out of his patrol car, Eric Harris turns his attention from shooting into the west doors of the high school to the student parking lot and to the deputy. Gardner, particularly visible in the bright yellow shirt of the community resource officer’s uniform, is the target of Harris’ bullets. Harris fires about 10 shots at the deputy with his rifle before his weapon jams.

· Gardner fires four shots at Harris.

· Harris spins hard to his right and Gardner momentarily thinks he has hit him. Seconds later, Harris begins shooting again at the deputy. Although Gardner’s patrol car is not hit by bullets, two vehicles that he is parked behind are hit by Harris’ gunfire. Investigators later found two bullet holes in each of the cars.

· Harris then turns and enters the school through the west doors. "

Reply

Buck Harmon

10:50 am on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

If guns don't make people safer, why do all world perceived leaders have heavily armed security forces surrounding them..?

Reply
Comment_arrow

PcTech

11:46 am on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Guns neither make people safer nor do they threaten them. The people who hold those guns do.

Steve

11:17 am on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

To protect them from nuts like you guys.

Reply

1ke

11:46 am on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

What's a world perceived leader? The world leaders must not really be the leaders. Buck might be and Joe and kevin. Are you, Buck, the tail that wags the dog? No wonder you need to be strapped.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Buck Harmon

12:37 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

The current World condition would be a great example of perceived leadership...keep believing the perceived world leaders...and reacting to their evils as you seem to while things are lead down the tube... not a matter for tails, dogs, straps or repeated dumb statements...seems to be the best that you offer though..understood..

Comment_arrow

Buck Harmon

12:46 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Another surrender comment Frank....I accept your surrender to this topic...I do realize that this is the best that you have to offer ...Happy New Year..

Comment_arrow

FIFA_archived

12:51 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

For Buck, courtesy of Elvis:

"So, my darling, please surrender
All your love so warm and tender
Let me hold you in my arms, dear
While the moon shines bright above"

Comment_arrow

1ke

2:04 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Dictionary? Are you nuts? Launch mode is now red. Do you read me? Red. Out.

Sanchez

1:14 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Cops told NBC not to use gun clip

NBC was told by the Washington, D.C., police that it was “not permissible” to show a high-capacity gun magazine on air before Sunday’s “Meet the Press,” according to a statement Wednesday from the cops.

“NBC contacted [the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department] inquiring if they could utilize a high capacity magazine for their segment,” Gwendolyn Crump, a police spokeswoman, said in an email. “NBC was informed that possession of a high capacity magazine is not permissible and their request was denied. This matter is currently being investigated.”

politico.com/story/2012/12/cops-nbc-told-dont-use-gun-clip-85497.html#ixzz2GBPowesv

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sanchez

1:18 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

"NBC News fires Zimmerman tape producer
NBC News has fired the producer responsible for the edited audio tape of George Zimmerman, the neighborhood watch volunteer who shot Trayvon Martin."

http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2012/04/nbc-fires-zimmerman-tape-producer-119881.html

Comment_arrow

Buck Harmon

5:52 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Good wallow Fifi..! very telling indeed..

FIFA_archived

2:12 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Chris, I really believe you are not that ignorant. What makes a more attractive unprotected target? Your child or the President's children? Should the President's children be kidnapped or killed by terrorists it would have worldwide implications. If it was your child, it would devastating to you and your family and friends and a sad event. However, it would not be a national security issue. There is no hypocrisy in the fact that the President and his family's lives are more highly regarded than yours. It has been that way before this President took office and will continue when he leaves and is replaced. AKA a fact of life.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Chris W

2:41 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

You could could be more wrong FIFA. We do not have a ruling aristocracy here. No one's child should be more "highly regarded" they are not any more worthy than any other child, the difference is the risk.

Have the children of the president always been so closely guarded? No. So ask yourself what changed.

The answer is that over time the risk to the president's family changed. As the risk changed, prudent protective measures were taken.

Now if the country has reached a point where the risk to school children is more significant, why is it crazy to want to respond in the exact same way?

Comment_arrow

Buck Harmon

3:49 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

If, by being President, I felt that my children's life could in any way be in danger I would home school without question...the tab for taxpayers would be much less as well..
The fact that his children would need that kind of protection to attend school only lends itself to the fact that all children deserve the same....recent shootings being case and point..

Comment_arrow

Buck Harmon

3:51 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

You also say nothing could be further from true a lot Fifi...you are wrong..again..

Comment_arrow

FIFA_archived

5:27 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Chris, you have made your argument. Nothing could be further from the truth that some lives are not considered more valuable than others. That is a fact of life, whether you believe it or not. If not, too bad, I'll never convince you otherwise.

Comment_arrow

FIFA_archived

5:28 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Buck, go give us a history on the 16th amendment or how we don't know the real story about 9/11. We are still waiting. Instead of rhetoric, what is the truth about 9/11?
C'mon Buck, your friends want to hear the truth.

Comment_arrow

Buck Harmon

5:40 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Fifi...These are the type of comments made by you regularly when you lose your argument in full view...surrender..nice try though..

Comment_arrow

FIFA_archived

5:43 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Blucky Buckaroo, the surrender stuff has gotten older than your 9/11 conspiracy theories. Please tell us what was really behind 9/11, everyone wants to know. C'mon Blucky, you can do it. Why did those Twin Towers collapse? You know, share it with us, ppppllllllleeeeeaaaaaaassssssseeeeeee.

Eastsider

2:44 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Why is that FIFA what makes his children so damn special?

Reply
Comment_arrow

SOUTHWESTMINSTER

3:01 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Could they use your child as leverage against the country, I think not........

Eastsider

3:08 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Again what makes his children so special. I would expect my government to do the same for my child or your child. Nothing more because of who they are, the President children.

Reply
Comment_arrow

FIFA_archived

5:25 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

How many death threats have you or your children received Eastsider, Chris, Buck, or any other of you "protect all of the children" nuts?

http://jezebel.com/5963372/massive-number-of-death-threats-against-president-obama-exhausts-the-secret-service

Comment_arrow

Buck Harmon

5:33 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Doesn't matter a damn bit Fifi...whats good for the goose is good for the gander...
He..they have always had the option of home school...in the case of being the President's kids they can't possibly live the same life of others anyway...kinda goes with the turf of the Presidents career choice...they could deal with it if the threats are real...much safer, and cost effective..

Comment_arrow

Buck Harmon

5:36 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Also Fifi, I believe that many of the actions taken by Obama could potentially be a threat to the future security and safety of my grandchildren...actions are speaking louder than his words with this regard..

Comment_arrow

Eastsider

6:44 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

How many against Obama's kids? Now before you speak find evidence to back up your statement.....

Comment_arrow

Chris W

6:56 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

How many of the kids in Connecticut had threats against them?

What a stupid comment.

Comment_arrow

1ke

7:24 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

The President has enough on his plate without being burdened with the welfare of his children. Eastsider, if God forbid your children or mine were kidnapped, we might cave in to the pressure and show up at the wrong dry cleaner to pick up our sweater or cheap-ass suit or wreck our five year-old sedan.

Actually, the President's children are more important than your children and mine. You doubt that? Ask around.

Comment_arrow

Eastsider

7:36 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Guess you don't cherish your children as I do. Everybody's children deserve equal protection.

Comment_arrow

1ke

8:37 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

I just have an unfailing sense of perspective, Eastsider. Love my kids. Love life. But, I never ever forget where I fit in.

Comment_arrow

Chris W

6:17 am on Thursday, December 27, 2012

Let's be clear. I am not saying that they do not deserve protection. Quite the contrary, I feel they are in great need of protection. The reason is not that they are somehow more important, the reason is they are more at risk.

Steve

5:01 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

The statement that LaPierrenoid made about Sidwell Friends was pretty lame. It's even lamer that the NRA sheeple keep parroting it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Native

5:12 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Not lame at all. If you dismiss this by saying, "Of course they have armed guards -- they get Secret Service protection," then you've missed the larger point.
The larger point is that this is standard operating procedure for the school, period. And this is the reason people like NBC's David Gregory send their kids to Sidwell, they know their kids will be protected from the carnage that befell kids at a school where armed guards weren't used (and weren't even allowed).

Comment_arrow

FIFA_archived

5:36 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Private school, private money, you want a SRO in your kid's school. Start writing checks.

Lorna D. Rudnikas

5:06 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

I agree with Chris..."risk" is the change factor and now, we continue to face homicidal maniacs that delight in going down in history as horrendous killers of adults, teens and now babies. Does that ring of "increased risk?" Of course!! So let us not quibble about the part that the social media plays in giving these b'stards a lot of what they are looking for...Fame at any price!!! All the gun control in the universe will not keep these maniacs from accomplishing their need..they leaves signs and trails..get them off the streets. But in the mean time, try to protect our citizens and their children as needed. SROs in the schools play an extremely important role and we will never, ever know how many tragedies they have prevented from happening just by being there. Sadly, even the b'stards want 15 minutes of fame, at our expense. Taking weapons of defense away from law abiding citizens just isn't going to cut it as we can see by the latest action taken by another maniac in New York...by fire and gun fire. He planned, executed and died. Pity is he should have died a long time ago when found guilty of killing his grandmother.

Reply

Chris W

5:14 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Nothing lame about it.

Where we're you all back in 1998 when Clinton proposed the "cops in school" program?
Democrat idea = good
Mean Nasty NRA idea = bad

Reply

Buck Harmon

5:18 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Take guns away from law abiding citizens and who is left with them....dumb thoughts can never prevail in this case.....some they can, like the President choice...but not with perceived gun control..

Reply
Comment_arrow

Buck Harmon

8:05 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Hasn't worked to date Frank...wise up..

Steve

5:19 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Just for the record there is only one security guard at Sidwell Friends.

I thought putting armed guards in the school was a dumb idea in 1998 and I still think it's a dumb idea now.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Chris W

5:23 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

And that is more than they had in Connecticut now isn't it?

Hypocrites!

Comment_arrow

Buck Harmon

5:24 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

It's dumb for your daughter to teach at such a potentially dangerous school too..

Buck Harmon

5:22 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

if armed guards are good enough for Obama's kids they sure as hell are good enough for mine...regardless of his perceived status ..

Reply
Comment_arrow

FIFA_archived

5:34 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

His "perceived" status is not perceived and no, your children do not qualify for secret service protection. People may need to be protected from the likes of you though Bucky babyroo.

Comment_arrow

Buck Harmon

5:49 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Not everyone thinks as highly of his status as you do Fifi...that would make his status a perception to many...perceived if you will..

Comment_arrow

Chris W

7:23 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

As if on cue, Frank brings up race.

As if there is no other reason to dislike the president. I guess I hate my own kind because I disliked Carter?

Give me a break!

Steve

5:34 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

I remember when the Baltimore County Police assigned a pedophile to protect a middle school. What could possibly go wrong with that??

http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2006-02-15/news/0602150177_1_dundalk-middle-baltimore-county-blankenship

Reply

FIFA_archived

5:38 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Most interesting is the NRA's lame excuse it is the nasty computer games that my kids play that help cause this. Every wonder who has links on the game's websites? How about major gun manufacturers!

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/25/business/real-and-virtual-firearms-nurture-marketing-link.html?hp&pagewanted=all&_r=1&;

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sanchez

6:31 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

"Research into violent video games (VVGs) is primarily conducted by psychologists in the United States. It takes place in a controversial political context of free speech disputes and school shootings. Much of this research has shown that playing VVGs is a small to moderate risk factor in later aggressive behaviour, at least in the short-term. However, over the course of this review a number of problems emerged with these findings that reduce their policy relevance."

"There is some consensus in the research that some members of the community, such as people with psychotic personality traits, may be more affected by VVGs than others. However, there is mixed evidence as to whether VVGs have a greater impact on children."

"In conclusion, research into the effects of VVGs on aggression is contested and inconclusive."

Literature review on the impact of playing violent video games on aggression.
Australian Government Attorney General's Dept.

http://www.classification.gov.au/Pages/Public/Media-And-Student-Resources/Other%20Resources/Literature%20review%20on%20the%20impact%20of%20playing%20violent%20video%20games%20on%20aggression.pdf

"If it saves just one child's life."

Comment_arrow

FIFA_archived

6:35 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

You missed the entire point Joe.

Comment_arrow

Sanchez

6:55 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

You stated "Most interesting is the NRA's lame excuse it is the nasty computer games that my kids play that help cause this."

I simply showed you that the study noted by the Australian government agreed with the NRA. The games DO, thus the conclusion of the study.
"There is some consensus in the research that some members of the community, such as people with psychotic personality traits, may be more affected by VVGs than others. "

With 320,000,000 people here yes a few will be evil.

What exactly does the NRA have to do with the ads on the websites of the games?
Does the NRA also advertise there as well? Does the Obama regime? Does The Brady Bunch?

I go to the Medal of Honor site and I first see a huge ad pushing a movie the Obama regime gave classified documents to the producers and promoted the movie before the election. Is the Obama regime or even Hollywierd responsible just like you claim the NRA is? I don't see any NRA ads.
Looks like Obama and Osama is what people see when they go to the website, not the NRA.

Comment_arrow

Sanchez

7:00 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

From the NYT link "Links on the Medal of Honor site allowed visitors to click through on the Web sites of the game’s partners and peruse their catalogs."

I just went there and it must have been changed or the NYT is lying again. Can't "click through". There are other firearm part manufactures that are the leaders in the indusrty.

http://www.medalofhonor.com/partners

Comment_arrow

Sanchez

7:01 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

MAGPUL has a great old time calendar. Oh, and great parts for your generic Rem 870 to make it look mean and scare libs to death.

http://store.magpul.com/prod_detail_list/shotgun
http://store.magpul.com/product/MAG913/124

Comment_arrow

Sanchez

7:20 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

From your link "“It was almost like a virtual showroom for guns,” said Ryan Smith, who contributes to the Gameological Society, an online gaming magazine."

That page contains 14 advertisers. Of those ONLY 3 manufacture firearms. And they are all custom and very expensive.
One sells eye protection, one sells gloves, one sells cameras. Others sell firearm parts and accessories.
Some have contracts with the government for optics and accessories. Is the Obama regime now to blame for supporting these companies that make optics possibly used on a cheap firearm used in a rare crime?

Hardly a "virtual showroom for guns". This is what we read when we read people with agendas.
Never believe the press, look for yourself.

Comment_arrow

Sanchez

7:22 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

And that was in the 4th paragraph. Why should I read further if I can see the story is based on falsehoods?

FIFA_archived

5:40 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

You don't like Obama's policies than vote him out Blucky Buckaroo! Oh, that's right, you lost twice. Bummer.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Buck Harmon

5:46 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

I love it when Fifi crawls from his hole and directly into a pool of surrender...nothing fresh, nothing new...same old spew...he wallows well though...get back to facts Fifi, or crawl back...you've lost your stand.

Comment_arrow

Steve

6:03 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

FIFA, you must not read the Patriot Post and World Nut Daily. The Kenyan actually stole the election. Now he is going to turn the Country over to the NWO in some kind of nefarious United Nations Plot...

http://www.wnd.com/2012/11/adding-up-the-evidence-to-a-stolen-election/

Comment_arrow

Chris W

6:19 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

That is because FIFA, Frank, Steve, and those like them don't want a democracy, or a constitutional republic. They want a liberal theocracy where we bow to the dear leader who is obviously much more intelligent than we are and knows what is best for us.

Comment_arrow

FIFA_archived

6:20 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Working on adjusting my firewall now. It generally avoids letting BS through. Bucky has never once stated a fact or repeated a fact from someone else. He only has his 2 cent opinions to spout. Just like Old Faithful. I thought ATC was married to LR, I'm no longer so sure.

Comment_arrow

FIFA_archived

6:26 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Clearly Chris the President is more intelligent than you are. How is that Harvard degree of yours coming along? I don't concede him that though. You should it is a safe bet. You lost twice in a row because you thought he wasn't as smart as Karl "The Brain" Rove who is now hiding from donors. His intelligence is obvious. What is hidden, is your lack, what is funny, is you don't know it. What is funnier, if Hillary runs and wins we will have 8 more years of democratic rule. The only thing keeping you guys alive is redistricting. And that won't last, the demographics are like getting old, they are coming to take you away, hehe.

Comment_arrow

Chris W

6:31 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

FIFI I have house plants that have a higher IQ than you do.

Comment_arrow

FIFA_archived

6:34 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Chrissy, anytime you want to match IQs, name the place and time and bring some serious money. Whipping up on your double digits is really pretty simple.

Comment_arrow

Chris W

6:46 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

What do you know, The trifecta of stupid has spoken.

Comment_arrow

FIFA_archived

6:54 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Chrissy's have shrunk to the size of BBs.

Comment_arrow

Chris W

6:59 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Did you think long and hard for that one FIFI? I'm so impressed by your intellect .

Comment_arrow

FIFA_archived

7:03 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

I like money Chris, I figure my odds are at least 49 to 1 taking your money. Odds too good to turn down. Serious cash though, at least 4 digits and that's not including the pennies.

Comment_arrow

Chris W

7:08 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

FIFI said "I like money".

I guess that explains the liberal guilt.

Comment_arrow

Buck Harmon

8:09 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Come on Frank..be a good boy...wise up..

Steve

6:24 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

"They want a liberal theocracy where we bow to the dear leader who is obviously much more intelligent than we are and knows what is best for us."

Nope, I didn't vote for Crazy Uncle Ron.

Reply

Native

6:56 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

I think we've beat this horse to death. Too many personal attacks now instead of reasoned discourse.

Reply

Lorna D. Rudnikas

7:19 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Agree Native..sadly some feel duty bound to derail and attack at every level in hopes that serious revealing discussion will go by the wayside. Guess farewell is the best way to handle it at this point in time.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Buck Harmon

8:10 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Wise up Frank..you're done here..good boy..

Comment_arrow

1ke

8:40 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

So you and your old man are gone. Damn!

Steve

7:28 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

I think it was derailed at the "Waah! Waah! Secret Service agents protect the President's children."

They have only been doing it since 1901...........

Reply
Comment_arrow

Chris W

7:36 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

1951 Congress enacted legislation that permanently authorized Secret Service protection of the president, his immediate family, the president-elect, and the vice president, if he wishes. (Public Law - 82-79).

In 1902 there were two secret service agents.

Try again Steve.

1ke

7:29 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

ut oh...waiting for your post Native.

Reply

Steve

7:54 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Two Secret Service Agents assigned to protect the President.

There were lots of SS agents. It was founded in 1865.

Reply

Chris W

9:38 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

From the SS website

1902 The Secret Service assumed full-time responsibility for protection of the President. Two operatives were assigned full time to the White House Detail.

No points this round, but thanks for playing

Reply

Gregg Roberts

4:41 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013

"The greatest danger to American freedom is a government that ignores the Constitution."
Thomas Jefferson
Third President of the United States

Thank you Mr. Cardin for ignoring the constitution and questioning the wisdom of our founding fathers..all of whom would have sent you packing.

Reply

Gregg Roberts

4:45 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013

“The Constitution shall never be construed to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms.”
― Samuel Adams

Reply

Lorna D. Rudnikas

11:13 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013

And so the only thing missing here is for the voices of the people to be heard, loudly, strongly that our Constitution will not be put asunder. Problem is, some folks don't have a clue what "asunder" even means (useful in divide and conquer)....part of the dummied down education system I suppose. And so, that slow, but sure sting, by sting of our education system is now coming back big time to "sting" us in the butt-a-voo!! For some it is an answer to their political prayers!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Steve

11:18 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013

Put the wine Bottle down Grandma!

Lorna D. Rudnikas

11:25 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013

Oh, oh, little Stevee...your on this thread too? I thought you were safely back under the rock...geez, they let you in everywhere. Now we have the smart alec garbaaage to deal with rather than sensible interchange. Yikes!!!

Reply

Lorna D. Rudnikas

11:27 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013

Of course you are on this thread...Stevee darling....and have been for much too long!!

Reply

Buck Harmon

8:09 am on Friday, February 22, 2013

Ben Cardin should take a few lesson's from Ben Carson....

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lorna D. Rudnikas

12:13 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

Buck...terrific! Beautifully stated!!

CP

9:00 am on Friday, February 22, 2013

I'm still waiting for Ben to cure cancer. I will never forget that political ad he used in 2008. Who votes for this guy? Oh wait.....

Reply

Steve

12:16 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

LOL Only you would want people with mental health issues to be able to own firearms.

Whadda Maroon!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Chris W

5:28 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

There s a little thing called due process that should be followed first.

Comment_arrow

Chris W

5:33 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

And over 10,000 people were killed in drunk driving related accidents last year alone. What is your point.

Steve

3:40 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

Smart man but no common sense. His potential candidacy is a no runner. Go find another Herman Cain to prop up, but vet him first.

Reply
Comment_arrow

CP

3:52 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

That's right. A black man cannot be a conservative. Stupid Uncle Tom's! What was I thinking?

Carson's recent speech was noting but common sense. Your head is up your hemorrhoided arse!

Comment_arrow

CP

3:56 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

A black conservative scares the hell out of you. It goes against everything you believe in. It scares you because you do not like the negro off the plantation.

Steve

4:03 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

He's not a Conservative. He even said so himself.

Turn off the Limbaugh and pick up a paper.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Buck Harmon

4:10 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

Dr. Carson is an Independent, and would never stoop the the level of claim to be liberal or conservative... they only cause divide...divide is dumb, we aren't dealing with it very well either..Steve...you are a divider...Ben Carson is a conqueror..

Comment_arrow

CP

4:14 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

Are kidding me? He has very conservative values and ideas. The (I) is just a label. Think beyond your nose.

Comment_arrow

Steve

4:16 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

If he says he isn't a Conservative thats good enough for me. Whoa re you to tell him what he is or isn't?

Steve

4:14 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

Ben Carson is smart enough not to let the Republican Party use him as a Mascot.

Reply

CP

4:30 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

happy hour...cue The Housemartins!

Reply

Leave a comment

 
 
 

Your town. Mobilized.

Download Patch for iPhone or Patch Places for Android.

Learn more 

Own a local business?

Stay in touch with customers by claiming your free Patch listing.

Learn more 

Advertise on Patch

Build community trust in your local brand with game-changing tools for any budget.

Learn how