TakomaPark
Current Weather
- Today
- 68°
- Local every day in
There will be a test of the system first.
If you hate standing in lines at the polls every election day then Takoma Park has a solution.
City voters will have the option of casting their ballots over the Internet for the November 2011 election, and a test of the system is going to be conducted June 9 at the Takoma Park Community Center.
Poorvi Vora, an associate professor at George Washington University made a presentation of the online voting system to Takoma Park’s Board of Elections (BOE) at the board’s meeting May 18.
The opportunity for voters to cast their ballots over the Internet begins with absentee ballots that will be mailed to voters, Vora said. The absentee ballots will arrive at voters’ homes in a 9.5 x 6.5 envelope.
Once opened, voters will immediately see that the big envelope contains two smaller envelopes, Vora said.
One will be a sealed envelope containing the ballot. It will not be reused after the voter has opened it. The second will be an unsealed outer envelope meant for returning the ballot to the city. It will contain a third unsealed inner envelope.
The third inner envelope also contains scratch-off codes that the voter uses to cast her vote online if she wishes to do so, according to Takoma Park City Clerk Jessie Carpenter.
The voter who wishes to return the ballot by mail may do so by putting her marked ballot in the inner envelope, which she will put in the outer envelope and mail to the city, Carpenter said. This is exactly the absentee voting process used in the past.
The voter has the choice to use the internet this year, but may use postal mail if he or she wishes.
That envelope with say “For Internet Voting” or something like that, Vora said. The reason the numbers and passwords are placed under silver scratch off material “is if the envelope arrives at the Board of Elections and it is not scratched off, that person did not try to vote over the Internet,” she said. If the silver scratch off material is missing, “that person could have voted over the Internet, and tried to cast a second ballot.” So as long as the silver sections are not scratched off, that ballot can be treated as a regular absentee ballot, she said.
Any ballots that arrive with the silver scratched off can be held to the side for review, at which point the BOE can decide to let a paper ballot overrule all electronic votes cast, Vora said. That way, if a voter submits a paper ballot, but there has been a ballot cast over the Internet, the online vote can be declared null by the BOE, and the paper ballot can take the place of that voter’s ballot.
The BOE has scheduled the test of the voting system from 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. in the Lilac Room of the Community Center, and Takoma Park senior citizens are being asked to test the system to identify its “strengths and weaknesses,” the BOE said.
During the test, the electronic voter interface and the absentee voting system will be available for testing. The test will have two races, voters will be asked to cast a ballot for their favorite Beatle, and their favorite poet. Refreshments will be available, and once participants have voted they will be asked to share their opinions of the system, the BOE said.
Correction: The original headline stated voters would be able to cast ballots online in 2011 citywide elections. Voters might be able to, but a decision has not been made yet. We regret the error.
Jessie Carpenter
5:27 pm on Saturday, May 21, 2011
Readers may recall that Takoma Park voters in the 2009 city election were able to later check their votes online, though absentee voters did not have that opportunity. As proposed, the new absentee voting process this year---with the codes and passwords--- provides that opportunity to absentee voters. Importantly, as with all other aspects of the election, it enables a voter to do so while being ensured that his or her vote is kept secret.
The ability to vote online is not being proposed as a full-fledged voting system for all voters, but provides a voting opportunity to those absentee voters unable to get their ballots in by the deadline. The codes on the ballot allow them to confirm that the ballot was counted and was not lost in the mail. Note that voters do not download a ballot using this system. Further, because they use codes while voting, at no point does any computer system on the internet know for which candidate a voter has voted.
This is not a final version of the voting system, and the proposal will be reviewed by many (further reviewed by the Takoma Park Board of Elections, tested by potential voters, critiqued by other researchers, and approved by the City Council), before it is used.
Dr. Filip Zagorski demonstrated the use of the absentee ballots at the meeting. The system will be fielded by the Scantegrity voting team which provided the voting system used by Takoma Park in the 2009 election.
Jessie Carpenter, Takoma Park City Clerk
Richard Carback
9:27 pm on Sunday, May 22, 2011
Our team (Scantegrity) has posted additional information here:
https://scantegrity.org/blog/2011/05/21/will-takoma-park-voters-be-able-to-cast-ballots-online-for-the-2011-city-election/
If anyone has additional questions we are always available and willing to answer them.
Rebecca Wilson
3:24 am on Sunday, May 22, 2011
A TRULY FOOLISH IDEA!
Those who followed DC's internet voting experiment last fall, in which DC's election board invited hackers to test the system before it went live, will already know what a stupid idea internet voting is. University of Michigan computer science professor Alex Halderman and his grad students were able to hack into the election board's computers within 36 hrs, controlling building security cameras, compromising the privacy of all voters who had submitted ballots and changing their votes to write-ins for evil sci-fi robots, and programming the system to play the UMich fight song when a ballot was submitted.
Even though they were making their presence as obvious as possible, it was only after they had been inside the system for 3 days that DC's election officials realized they'd been hacked when other testers complained about the fight song. And while inside, the hackers discovered that botnets from China and Iran had already penetrated the system -- not because they were deliberately targeting it to control elections, but just because they penetrate ALL systems connected to the internet which are not well secured.
DC wisely abandoned its plans to go live with the internet pilot in last November's election, but stubbornly defends its foolish resolve to try again in the future. Now it seems Takoma Park is next in line to drink the internet voting Kool-aid.
Rebecca Wilson, Co-Director, SAVEourVotes.org
Secure, Accessible, Verifiable Elections for Maryland
Richard Carback
9:38 pm on Sunday, May 22, 2011
Please note that our proposal is nothing like that of the DC project. Voters do not enter any identifying information to the computer they are using, and they also do not enter their choices. A hacker who has access the system is limited to changing the data to be invalid, but this would be detected. Our goal is to add transparency, verifiability, and auditability to the absentee voting process.
Alex Halderman is well aware of our group, and we may be asking him, among other researchers, to review our final proposal. This report is about a meeting to get feedback from the Board regarding reasonable tasks to expect from absentee voters before we finalize the protocol for review by security experts.
I invite you to learn more about our project, and to ask us any questions that you may have. You can do so privately, and via our publicly archived mailing lists.
April Kissel
11:11 am on Sunday, June 5, 2011
Rebecca, I'm disappointed in you. SAVEourVotes should endorse verifiable voting. If one is to condemn online voting, one might as well level the same criticism toward all other activities that take place electronically.
Online voting is being *considered* as an alternative this year, in part to assess its merits for Takoma Park city elections going forward. The forging of a good working relationship between the Board of Elections and the providers of the voting product (Scantegrity) goes a long way toward avoiding an outcome such as that experienced in DC.
Rick is correct in drawing a distinction between the Scantegrity system and the one implemented in the DC election. As well, online voting can increase participation. Any innovation entails weighing risks against benefits.
I, for one, hope you decide to join us in bringing about Secure, Accessible and Verifiable Elections for Maryland.
April Kissel
Takoma Park Board of Elections Committee
Ward 4
Jay Levy
9:19 am on Sunday, May 22, 2011
Cyberspace voting? Something doesn't seem right about casting one's vote into.......what, a void where many things can be manipulated. Why not just have a mail-in system where you just drop off your ballot at any mailbox. I believe the state of Washington has that option, and it has worked well.
Richard Carback
9:42 pm on Sunday, May 22, 2011
This proposal is an add-on to absentee voting, so what you are suggesting will still persist. We are, however, making the process verifiable. Whether you choose to return a ballot via mail or via the website, you would have the ability to verify that it will be counted as cast (assuming it passes peer review and the city council approves).